<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve &#187; contested case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/tag/contested-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog</link>
	<description>Our Water..Our Legacy..Our Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Petitioners Appeal Court Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/12/petitioners-appeal-court-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/12/petitioners-appeal-court-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contested case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Groups Appeal Decision Allowing Dangerous Mine to Move Forward  MARQUETTE, MICH. (December 12, 2011) – A coalition of groups is appealing a court decision that has allowed a dangerous mine to proceed in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula—despite the threat the mine poses to water quality, the Great Lakes and one of the region’s last spawning grounds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong>Groups Appeal Decision Allowing Dangerous Mine to Move Forward</strong></p>
<p> <strong>MARQUETTE, MICH. (December 12, 2011)</strong> – A coalition of groups is appealing a court decision that has allowed a dangerous mine to proceed in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula—despite the threat the mine poses to water quality, the Great Lakes and one of the region’s last spawning grounds for the coaster brook trout. </p>
<p> The Huron Mountain Club, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, National Wildlife Federation and Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve filed the motion with the Michigan Court of Appeals over the weekend. The groups are opposing the mine on the grounds that it poses unacceptable risks to water and air quality—and that it could collapse, endangering workers and the river it is underneath.</p>
<p> “This mine is the first to be permitted under Michigan&#8217;s new mining law, and we must ensure that the law’s protections of human health and the environment are honored and applied,” said <strong>Michelle Halley, attorney for the National Wildlife Federation</strong>. “So far, they have not been and that is why we are seeking leave to appeal. Many more mines are in the queue and this is a precedent-setting case.”</p>
<p> The groups are appealing a decision by the Ingham County Circuit Court that allowed international mining company Rio Tinto to start mining activities on Eagle Rock—a site considered sacred to Native Americans.</p>
<p> “It is very important to the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community to protect Eagle Rock as a sacred place,” said <strong>Chris Swartz, President, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community</strong>, “and we are hopeful that this appeal will result in the Court of Appeals reversing the decisions of the circuit court.”</p>
<p> The type of mine being proposed—in which nickel and copper deposits are extracted from sulfide ores—poses severe risks to the environment. One byproduct of so-called “hard rock” or “sulfide ore” mining is sulfuric acid, which has proven deadly to rivers, streams and wildlife in other parts of the country. Rio Tinto, the company overseeing the project, has broken Clean Water Act laws dozens of times in mines they have controlled in other states.</p>
<p> Now, the Michigan Court of Appeals will decide whether to take the case. There is no date by which the court must make its decision.</p>
<p> “We will continue to put forth our concentrated efforts to ensure that this area remains unharmed and protected for everyone&#8217;s enjoyment, not just for special interests,” said <strong>Emily Whittaker, executive director of Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve.</strong></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2011%2F12%2F12%2Fpetitioners-appeal-court-decision%2F&amp;linkname=Petitioners%20Appeal%20Court%20Decision"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/12/petitioners-appeal-court-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDEQ reaction to court ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/10/mdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/10/mdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contested case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mich. regulator wants more info on proposed mine (AP) LANSING, Mich. — Michigan&#8217;s chief environmental regulator wants more information about a rocky outcrop in Marquette County that could affect plans for a nickel and copper mine. Steven Chester, director of the Department of Environmental Quality, on Friday asked Administrative Law Judge Richard Patterson to reconsider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mich. regulator wants more info on proposed mine<br />
(AP)<br />
LANSING, Mich. — Michigan&#8217;s chief environmental regulator wants more information about a rocky outcrop in Marquette County that could affect plans for a nickel and copper mine.<br />
Steven Chester, director of the Department of Environmental Quality, on Friday asked Administrative Law Judge Richard Patterson to reconsider his recommendation about the outcrop, known as Eagle Rock.<br />
Patterson last August said Chester should grant Kennecott Eagle Minerals Co. permits to build the mine — but only if steps are taken to protect Eagle Rock, which Indian tribes use for spiritual ceremonies.<br />
Kennecott Eagle plans to run the mine&#8217;s entrace tunnel beneath the 60-foot-high rock.<br />
Chester asked Patterson to look further into whether Eagle Rock is legally a place of worship. After getting the judge&#8217;s opinion, Chester will decide on the permits.</p>
<p>Below is the actual Order of Remand from Chester</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/DEQ_Remand_-_Place_of_Worship1.doc">DEQ_Remand_-_Place_of_Worship[1]</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F10%2Fmdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling%2F&amp;linkname=MDEQ%20reaction%20to%20court%20ruling"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/10/mdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

