<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve &#187; mdeq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/tag/mdeq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog</link>
	<description>Our Water..Our Legacy..Our Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Petitioners Appeal Court Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/12/petitioners-appeal-court-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/12/petitioners-appeal-court-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contested case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Groups Appeal Decision Allowing Dangerous Mine to Move Forward  MARQUETTE, MICH. (December 12, 2011) – A coalition of groups is appealing a court decision that has allowed a dangerous mine to proceed in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula—despite the threat the mine poses to water quality, the Great Lakes and one of the region’s last spawning grounds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><strong>Groups Appeal Decision Allowing Dangerous Mine to Move Forward</strong></p>
<p> <strong>MARQUETTE, MICH. (December 12, 2011)</strong> – A coalition of groups is appealing a court decision that has allowed a dangerous mine to proceed in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula—despite the threat the mine poses to water quality, the Great Lakes and one of the region’s last spawning grounds for the coaster brook trout. </p>
<p> The Huron Mountain Club, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, National Wildlife Federation and Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve filed the motion with the Michigan Court of Appeals over the weekend. The groups are opposing the mine on the grounds that it poses unacceptable risks to water and air quality—and that it could collapse, endangering workers and the river it is underneath.</p>
<p> “This mine is the first to be permitted under Michigan&#8217;s new mining law, and we must ensure that the law’s protections of human health and the environment are honored and applied,” said <strong>Michelle Halley, attorney for the National Wildlife Federation</strong>. “So far, they have not been and that is why we are seeking leave to appeal. Many more mines are in the queue and this is a precedent-setting case.”</p>
<p> The groups are appealing a decision by the Ingham County Circuit Court that allowed international mining company Rio Tinto to start mining activities on Eagle Rock—a site considered sacred to Native Americans.</p>
<p> “It is very important to the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community to protect Eagle Rock as a sacred place,” said <strong>Chris Swartz, President, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community</strong>, “and we are hopeful that this appeal will result in the Court of Appeals reversing the decisions of the circuit court.”</p>
<p> The type of mine being proposed—in which nickel and copper deposits are extracted from sulfide ores—poses severe risks to the environment. One byproduct of so-called “hard rock” or “sulfide ore” mining is sulfuric acid, which has proven deadly to rivers, streams and wildlife in other parts of the country. Rio Tinto, the company overseeing the project, has broken Clean Water Act laws dozens of times in mines they have controlled in other states.</p>
<p> Now, the Michigan Court of Appeals will decide whether to take the case. There is no date by which the court must make its decision.</p>
<p> “We will continue to put forth our concentrated efforts to ensure that this area remains unharmed and protected for everyone&#8217;s enjoyment, not just for special interests,” said <strong>Emily Whittaker, executive director of Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve.</strong></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2011%2F12%2F12%2Fpetitioners-appeal-court-decision%2F&amp;linkname=Petitioners%20Appeal%20Court%20Decision"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/12/petitioners-appeal-court-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDEQ Decision Upheld by Judge</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/02/mdeq-decision-upheld-by-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/02/mdeq-decision-upheld-by-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow dog plains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YDWP was informed on November 23 that efforts by the four co-petitioners to challenge of the issuance of permits to mine on the Yellow Dog Plains were less than fruitful. Judge Paula Manderfield issued her decision to upheld the 2007 decision by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to grant permits to Kennecott Eagle Minerals to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YDWP was informed on November 23 that efforts by the four co-petitioners to challenge of the issuance of permits to mine on the Yellow Dog Plains were less than fruitful. Judge Paula Manderfield issued her decision to upheld the 2007 decision by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality to grant permits to Kennecott Eagle Minerals to develop a copper/nickel mining operation in Marquette County.</p>
<p>Arguments were made in June 2011 by petitioners and respondents of the appeals case. The decision to uphold the issuance of the permits came with a lengthy document regarding the judge&#8217;s opinion. It is attached below.</p>
<p>Upon reviewing the opinion, YDWP staff found the verbage to be less than unbiased. Many arguments that the petitioners made were simply considered null and void because there was a counter argument by the respondents. Additionally, for almost each argument the petitioners made, the opinion statement contained the counterargument, as well as information from cross-examination of only the petitioner&#8217;s witnesses.</p>
<p>For those of us who live here and will be left to deal with the actual outcomes, the court&#8217;s opinions of the Kirtland&#8217;s Warbler as a &#8220;handful of birds not nesting in the area&#8221; are demeaning. The court also agreed with Kennecott&#8217;s biologist that the Yellow Dog Plains contain no critical habitat for the Kirtland&#8217;s Warbler. Yet many of the surrounding jack pine forests on the plains are specifically managed for the warbler&#8217;s habitat.</p>
<p>YDWP encourages supporters to read the opinion for themselves and to assess whether a fair and impartial trial took place.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Final_Appellate_Decision_11-23-11.PDF">Final_Appellate_Decision_11-23-11</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2011%2F12%2F02%2Fmdeq-decision-upheld-by-judge%2F&amp;linkname=MDEQ%20Decision%20Upheld%20by%20Judge"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/12/02/mdeq-decision-upheld-by-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copperwood Permit Application Submitted</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/10/06/copperwood-permit-application-submitted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/10/06/copperwood-permit-application-submitted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mining ventures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orvana Minerals submitted their mining permit application on Friday, September 23.  By the following Monday, it was deemed administratively complete by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. A permit review team has already been assembled and is currently reviewing the application. The application is available online at the following website: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Orvana_Copperwood_Part_632_Permit_Application_files_4_web_364638_7.pdf According to Orvana Resources, the company entered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orvana Minerals submitted their mining permit application on Friday, September 23.  By the following Monday, it was deemed administratively complete by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. A permit review team has already been assembled and is currently reviewing the application. The application is available online at the following website: <a href="http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Orvana_Copperwood_Part_632_Permit_Application_files_4_web_364638_7.pdf">http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Orvana_Copperwood_Part_632_Permit_Application_files_4_web_364638_7.pdf</a></p>
<p>According to Orvana Resources, the company entered into mineral leases covering 1,759 acres in an area located in the Upper Peninsula 30 kilometres southwest of the inactive White Pine Mine, which operated between 1953 and 1996.  Based on their calculations, the company targets production start up around 2013.</p>
<p>It is not unlikely to see a cascade of mining applications come to the MDEQ now that Kennecott has begun drilling. Many companies openly admit that they wait for larger companies to test the system, then the smaller ones come in after the most resistance occurs. There are numerous deposits throughout the UP, many within the Yellow Dog, Salmon-Trout, and surrounding watersheds. These deposits are being explored by companies such as Prime Meridian, Kennecott, Aquila, and Hudbay.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2011%2F10%2F06%2Fcopperwood-permit-application-submitted%2F&amp;linkname=Copperwood%20Permit%20Application%20Submitted"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2011/10/06/copperwood-permit-application-submitted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDEQ gives permits &#8220;final&#8221; approval</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2010/01/18/mdeq-gives-permits-final-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2010/01/18/mdeq-gives-permits-final-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdnr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days before the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ceases to exist, a statement was issued giving &#8220;final approval&#8221; of mining permits that were being contested by Huron Mountain Club, National Wildlife Federation, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, and Keweenaw Bay Indian Community. The approval was given before the administrative law judge had submitted a clarification [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days before the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ceases to exist, a statement was issued giving &#8220;final approval&#8221; of mining permits that were being contested by Huron Mountain Club, National Wildlife Federation, Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, and Keweenaw Bay Indian Community. The approval was given before the administrative law judge had submitted a clarification of his ruling. The MDEQ stated the judge&#8217;s ruling was not needed since it pertained to Eagle Rock as a place of worship. They believe that a place of worship must be a building and therefore negates comments that were not in favor of the mining company.<br />
The four co-petitioners have indicated that an appeal to circuit court will be made. However, the company purports that construction and clearing will begin this year, even though they do NOT have their Underground Injection Control permit from the U.S Environmental Protection Agency. The former MDNR stated that they cannot begin construction until Kennecott has received this permit.<br />
Cynthia Pryor, of the Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve, stated, &#8221; This is an egregious act that now will absolutely require appeal to a higher court and should require an appeal to the new DNRE Director  Rebecca Humphries and the Governor of this state. We should not sit by and accept such action as the accepted mode of “lawfulness” in this state.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please call the office of the Governor and lodge your complaint:  517 373-3400 or 517 335-7858.<br />
Letters can be sent to:<br />
Governor Jennifer M. Granholm<br />
P.O. Box 30013<br />
Lansing, Michigan 48909<br />
PHONE: (517) 373-3400<br />
PHONE: (517) 335-7858 &#8211; Constituent Services<br />
FAX:(517) 335-6863</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F01%2F18%2Fmdeq-gives-permits-final-approval%2F&amp;linkname=MDEQ%20gives%20permits%20%26%238220%3Bfinal%26%238221%3B%20approval"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2010/01/18/mdeq-gives-permits-final-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humboldt Mill Permit Hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/20/humboldt-mill-permit-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/20/humboldt-mill-permit-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humboldt mill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kennecott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MDEQ gave preliminary approval to Kennecott for the reopening of a crushing facility in Humboldt township in Marquette County. Four separate permits were given draft approval and the MDEQ is now seeking comments from the public and stakeholders. A public hearing is scheduled for December 1, 2009 from 4pm to 10pm in Ishpeming, MI [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MDEQ gave preliminary approval to Kennecott for the reopening of a crushing facility in Humboldt township in Marquette County. Four separate permits were given draft approval and the MDEQ is now seeking comments from the public and stakeholders. A public hearing is scheduled for December 1, 2009 from 4pm to 10pm in Ishpeming, MI at Westwood High School, located at 300 Westwood Dr. Comments are sought on the 1) Air Use permit, 2) NPDES for discharge of treated water into the Escanaba River watershed, 3) Non-ferrous metallic mining permit to operate and reclaim the facility, and 4) deposition of tailings into a pit.</p>
<p>Each person will have five minutes to address the MDEQ with their concerns.<br />
Below are links to the permit applications:<br />
Air Use Permit: <a href="http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/5of4_295852_7.pdf">http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/5of4_295852_7.pdf</a><br />
NPDES Permit: <a href="http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/doc40f4_295708_7.pdf">http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/doc40f4_295708_7.pdf</a></p>
<p>Comments can also be submitted via email to <a href="mailto:DEQ-Kennecott-Humboldt-Mill-comments@michigan.gov">DEQ-Kennecott-Humboldt-Mill-comments@michigan.gov</a> or by mail to:<br />
DEQ Kennecott Comments<br />
Office of Geological Survey<br />
P.O. Box 30256<br />
Lansing, MI 48909-7756</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F20%2Fhumboldt-mill-permit-hearing%2F&amp;linkname=Humboldt%20Mill%20Permit%20Hearing"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/20/humboldt-mill-permit-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDEQ reaction to court ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/10/mdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/10/mdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contested case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mich. regulator wants more info on proposed mine (AP) LANSING, Mich. — Michigan&#8217;s chief environmental regulator wants more information about a rocky outcrop in Marquette County that could affect plans for a nickel and copper mine. Steven Chester, director of the Department of Environmental Quality, on Friday asked Administrative Law Judge Richard Patterson to reconsider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mich. regulator wants more info on proposed mine<br />
(AP)<br />
LANSING, Mich. — Michigan&#8217;s chief environmental regulator wants more information about a rocky outcrop in Marquette County that could affect plans for a nickel and copper mine.<br />
Steven Chester, director of the Department of Environmental Quality, on Friday asked Administrative Law Judge Richard Patterson to reconsider his recommendation about the outcrop, known as Eagle Rock.<br />
Patterson last August said Chester should grant Kennecott Eagle Minerals Co. permits to build the mine — but only if steps are taken to protect Eagle Rock, which Indian tribes use for spiritual ceremonies.<br />
Kennecott Eagle plans to run the mine&#8217;s entrace tunnel beneath the 60-foot-high rock.<br />
Chester asked Patterson to look further into whether Eagle Rock is legally a place of worship. After getting the judge&#8217;s opinion, Chester will decide on the permits.</p>
<p>Below is the actual Order of Remand from Chester</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/DEQ_Remand_-_Place_of_Worship1.doc">DEQ_Remand_-_Place_of_Worship[1]</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F11%2F10%2Fmdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling%2F&amp;linkname=MDEQ%20reaction%20to%20court%20ruling"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/11/10/mdeq-reaction-to-court-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDEQ and MDNR merge</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/10/12/mdeq-and-mdnr-merge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/10/12/mdeq-and-mdnr-merge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdnr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to state officials, the creation of a new Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE) will take effect on January 17, 2010.  The department’s mission will be a familiar one to our state government family:  To conserve, manage, protect and promote Michigan’s natural resources, environment and related economic interests for current and future generations.  This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">According to state officials, the creation of a new Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE) will take effect on January 17, 2010.  </span></span><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The department’s mission will be a familiar one to our state government family:  To conserve, manage, protect and promote Michigan’s natural resources, environment and related economic interests for current and future generations<em><span style="font-style: italic;">.  </span></em>This includes implementing an ecosystem-based strategy for resource management, effectively using natural resources in a sustainable manner, and providing for continuous improvements in Michigan’s air, water and soils while facilitating and encouraging economic growth.</span></span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here are some proposed changes.</span></span><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></span><em><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-style: italic;">  </span></span></em></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">Natural Resources Commission.   </span></span></strong>The Commission of Natural Resources will be transferred, intact, to the new DNRE but will be renamed the Natural Resources Commission (NRC).  Commission members will continue to serve through the end of their existing terms, and vacancies will continue to be filled by the governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. The NRC will retain existing authority to regulate the taking of game, establish periods of validity for hunting and fishing licenses, and regulate the feeding of deer and elk, without review by or appeal to, the DNRE director. The NRC will also assume functions currently performed by the Citizens Committee for Michigan State Parks and the Water Resources Conservation Advisory Council to further reduce administrative overhead. However, the governor, not the commission, will appoint the department director. </p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">Trails Advisory Council.  </span></span></strong>A seven-member Trails Advisory Council will be established under the executive order, and the functions of the existing Snowmobile Advisory Council and Michigan Trailways Advisory Council, which are being abolished under the order, will be given to this council.  The Michigan Trails Advisory Council will focus on the creation, development, operation, and maintenance of snowmobile, equestrian, hiking, skiing, and off-road vehicle trails. <span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">Environmental Science Board. </span></span></strong> The director of the DNRE will be authorized to convene a seven-member Environmental Science Review Board (ESRB) to advise the DNRE on scientific issues affecting the protection and management of Michigan’s environment and natural resources.  The ESRB will be comprised of individuals with expertise in biological sciences, chemistry, ecological science, geology, risk assessment, and other related disciplines.  The Site Review Board process under Part 111 of the NREPA is being eliminated for greater efficiency in environmental proceedings.</p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-size: 12pt;">Agriculture</span></span></strong>.  The executive order also impacts the Michigan Department of Agriculture by giving the governor responsibility for appointing the Agriculture director, a responsibility that is currently held by the Agriculture Commission.  The Office of Racing Commissioner will be transferred to the Michigan Gaming Control Board and the Racing Commissioner’s position will be abolished.  The executive director of the control board will assume the commissioner’s duties.  Several boards and commissions within the Department of Agriculture are also being abolished.  <span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The Governor is appointing Bruce Rasher to serve as transition manager to implement the order and begin building the new department with our help.  Bruce has a degree in fisheries and wildlife management from Michigan State University and worked for many years at Consumers Energy, where he was actively engaged in issues related to brownfield redevelopment, energy efficiency and environmental management.  He served as mayor of the city of Marshall from 1995 to 1998<strong><span style="font-weight: bold;">.   </span></strong></span></span></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F10%2F12%2Fmdeq-and-mdnr-merge%2F&amp;linkname=MDEQ%20and%20MDNR%20merge"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/10/12/mdeq-and-mdnr-merge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humboldt Mill Application Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/10/12/humboldt-mill-application-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/10/12/humboldt-mill-application-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humboldt mill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Humboldt Mill Environmental Permits Proposed for Approval The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) today announced its decision proposing permit approvals that would enable Kennecott to refurbish and then use the Humboldt Mill. The MDEQ has proposed approvals for three permits required under state law for operating the Humboldt Mill.  The MDEQ will hold a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humboldt Mill Environmental Permits Proposed for Approval<br />
The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) today announced its decision proposing permit approvals that would enable Kennecott to refurbish and then use the Humboldt Mill.<br />
The MDEQ has proposed approvals for three permits required under state law for operating the Humboldt Mill.  The MDEQ will hold a public hearing on the proposed permits on December 1, 4:00 &#8211; 10:00 p.m. at the Westwood High School Auditorium, Ishpeming. View proposed decisions and all documents related to the Humboldt Mill project at <a href="http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135-3311_4111_18442-205482--,00.html">http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135-3311_4111_18442-205482&#8211;,00.html</a>.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F10%2F12%2Fhumboldt-mill-application-decision%2F&amp;linkname=Humboldt%20Mill%20Application%20Decision"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/10/12/humboldt-mill-application-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petitioners appeal MDEQ decision</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/08/24/petitioners-appeal-mdeq-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/08/24/petitioners-appeal-mdeq-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdnr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 21, 2009 Contact: Michelle Halley, NWF – 906-361-0520 Preserving public access at heart of mine opponents’ appeal MARQUETTE, MI &#8212; Wrongfully putting a private company’s profit margin before the public’s interest is at the heart of a Notice of Appeal filed in the Michigan Court of Appeals today by the National [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
August 21, 2009<br />
Contact: Michelle Halley, NWF – 906-361-0520<br />
Preserving public access at heart of mine opponents’ appeal</p>
<p>MARQUETTE, MI &#8212; Wrongfully putting a private company’s profit margin before the public’s interest is at the heart of a Notice of Appeal filed in the Michigan Court of Appeals today by the National Wildlife Federation and three other local organizations.</p>
<p>Earlier this month, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Paula Manderfield said her court did not have jurisdiction to determine whether the Michigan Department of Natural Resources erred in its decision to lease 120 acres of State of Michigan lands to Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company for mining facilities. Opponents of a risky metallic sulfide mine proposed by Kennecott believe the lease is illegal.</p>
<p>Eagle Rock, a sacred outcropping visited by Native Americans for generations, is at the heart of the debate. Earlier this week, an administrative law judge recommended to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality that the mine’s entry portal be moved away from the sacred rock. In his decision, the judge stated that Kennecott and the MDEQ “did not properly address the impact on the sacred rock outcrop known as Eagle Rock.” </p>
<p>Availing themselves of the next step in the judicial process, NWF, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Huron Mountain Club, and Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve are pursuing their right to present evidence and be heard on whether denying the public access to public lands, including the rock sacred to local Native American tribes, is a violation of the public trust doctrine.</p>
<p>&#8220;The practical implication of the judge&#8217;s decision is that we could not present evidence regarding the public trust doctrine. We believe that having a hearing on the merits is the only fair way for this matter to proceed. This ruling eviscerates the public’s ability to implement the doctrine that requires that assets held by the State must be managed for the good of the public,” explained Michelle Halley, attorney for the National Wildlife Federation. </p>
<p>“Our challenge of the DNR lease dovetails with the administrative law judge’s finding that the MDEQ did not properly consider Eagle Rock’s use as a place of worship. The MDNR neglected to do so as well,” said the NWF attorney. </p>
<p>In addition to Eagle Rock, the portion of the Yellow Dog Plains that would be off limits to the public if the mine is allowed has historically been used by local hunters, anglers, hikers, and berry pickers. </p>
<p>“The public trust doctrine takes into consideration the historical use of the area, as well as public access. In this case, the public not only had access to the area for centuries, but actively used the lands for a variety of purposes. Now the State wants to take it away from the public and give it to a private, foreign-owned company for private gain. We deserve the chance to make our case and have it decided on merits. We are confident,” Halley said. </p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F08%2F24%2Fpetitioners-appeal-mdeq-decision%2F&amp;linkname=Petitioners%20appeal%20MDEQ%20decision"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/08/24/petitioners-appeal-mdeq-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge&#8217;s decision on mining application made</title>
		<link>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/08/19/judges-decision-on-mining-application-made/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/08/19/judges-decision-on-mining-application-made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elimywhit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sulfide mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eagle rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdnr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow dog plains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 18, 2009   Contact: Michelle Halley, NWF – 906-361-0520   Mine opponents find both good and bad in judge’s decision NWF and partners pleased with Eagle Rock protection, will appeal remainder of decision   MARQUETTE, MICH – Administrative Law Judge Richard Patterson announced today that he will uphold permits issued to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<br />
August 18, 2009<br />
 <br />
Contact: Michelle Halley, NWF – 906-361-0520<br />
 <br />
Mine opponents find both good and bad in judge’s decision<br />
NWF and partners pleased with Eagle Rock protection, will appeal remainder of decision<br />
 <br />
MARQUETTE, MICH – Administrative Law Judge Richard Patterson announced today that he will uphold permits issued to Kennecott Eagle Minerals Company by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality in 2007, with one critical exception that could nix the project or at the very least require a major overhaul of the mining plan. Nonetheless, the petitioners in the case will likely appeal the portions of the permits not struck down or modified. Attorneys say the contested case record provides a remarkably strong basis for appeal.<br />
 <br />
In his decision, Patterson recommended moving the mine’s portal, or entryway, from Eagle Rock, a sacred outcropping with spiritual importance to local Native American tribes. Patterson stated that Kennecott and the MDEQ “did not properly address the impact on the sacred rock outcrop known as Eagle Rock” and suggested moving the mine’s entry portal away from the rock. <br />
 <br />
Michelle Halley, attorney for the National Wildlife Federation, said “Kennecott has claimed for years that Eagle Rock is the only possible location for the mine’s portal. Without that option, this mine could be halted or, at the very least, require a complete overhaul of the mining plan. We are pleased that Eagle Rock will be protected, assuming MDEQ Director Steve Chester follows the judge’s recommendations on this issue.”<br />
 <br />
Patterson’s decision comes in the form of a recommendation to Chester. According to law, the parties in the case will have an opportunity to file exceptions to the judge’s recommendations by submitting a written document outlining those components with which they agree or disagree. Once Chester has received the exceptions, he will issue his final decision. Chester is not obligated to follow Patterson’s recommendations.<br />
 <br />
“While the protection of Eagle Rock is fantastic, it doesn’t address most of the technical deficiencies we outlined in the course of the contested case. Therefore we will almost certainly appeal the final agency decision should Director Chester adopt the judge’s recommendations on the remaining issues,” Halley stated.<br />
 <br />
The decision is the latest development in a series of legal challenges to prevent a foreign mining company with a deeply troubled environmental and human rights history from blasting a risky metallic sulfide mine beneath the Salmon Trout River in the central Upper Peninsula. Petitioners in the case are the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Huron Mountain Club, National Wildlife Federation and Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve.<br />
 <br />
In most areas, the judge’s recommendations failed to address issues that are important to protect workers and the environment. Halley, who said she is still reviewing all of the specifics of the decision, went on to say that NWF will address its concerns in written exceptions presented to the MDEQ and ultimately through appealing Chester’s final decision if it comes to that.<br />
 <br />
“We put on a solid case and created a factual record that will support appealing the remainder of the permit provisions that Judge Patterson left unaddressed. Many of those are too important to be overlooked and if they should remain unaddressed by Director Chester, we are prepared to appeal,” Halley stated. <br />
 <br />
“This ruling does not change our firm belief that the decision to permit this mine violates the law,” said Andy Buchsbaum, regional executive director of the National Wildlife Federation’s Great Lakes Regional Center. “We remain committed to protecting the people, economy and wildlife of Michigan from this risky type of mine that has proven deadly to rivers, streams and communities in other states.”<br />
 <br />
During oral arguments in the summer of 2008, NWF and its partners presented more than two dozen witnesses in a variety of technical disciplines. At the time, Halley remarked “the testimony in this case has done nothing but demonstrate Kennecott’s substandard job in preparing the application and the slipshod review by the DEQ. Testimony at the hearing from Kennecott, MDEQ and our experts proves time and time again that the proposed mine is unsafe for humans and the environment.”<br />
 <br />
Perhaps most stunning was the admission of MDEQ employee Joe Maki, leader of the mining review team that ultimately recommended approval of the mining permit. Asked under oath if he had applied mining law Part 632’s critical standard which states that the company must prove it will not pollute, impair, or destroy natural resources, Maki stated simply “I did not.” Asked if the mining review team had applied that standard, he said “I don’t believe so, no.”<br />
 <br />
Should MDEQ Director Chester act on Patterson’s recommendation regarding Eagle Rock, Kennecott will remain stymied and cannot conduct mining operations until a new mining plan is submitted and approved. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency must still decide whether the company could obtain necessary federal permits.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yellowdogwatershed.org%2Fblog%2F2009%2F08%2F19%2Fjudges-decision-on-mining-application-made%2F&amp;linkname=Judge%26%238217%3Bs%20decision%20on%20mining%20application%20made"><img src="http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yellowdogwatershed.org/blog/2009/08/19/judges-decision-on-mining-application-made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

